![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Another
damaging development project in the pipeline
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The proposed project is located around the hotel
but Outside the Development Zone, in a protected coastal zone of natural
beauty, designated as a buffer zone to protect the coastal cliffs and an
Area of Ecological Importance and Site of Scientific Importance.
Furthermore, the area lies between two proposed Sites of Community
Interest, as declared by Government Notice 112 of 2007, and is proposed as
part of the Special Areas of Conservation, Sites of International
Importance, and Special Protection Area, besides being scheduled. The site
is mainly made up of protected garigue and also includes protected trees. This same speculator of land has been responsible for the
negative changes that have taken place at Santa Maria Estate as well as
the over-development and environmental damage at Tigne, FAA cannot but be
concerned at the project which will eliminate one of the few remaining
pristine sites. MEPA’s
regulations stipulate that : No
form of urban development will be permitted outside existing and committed
built-up areas. Exceptions to this rule are restricted to farming and
countryside recreation developments with due caution. A project of these dimensions should not be
considered before a holistic study (SEA) is carried out to assess the
tourism needs for this type of accommodation and if such a need is
required, where it can best be located in order to
avoid the destruction of the Mellieha headland. This especially in the
light of the fact that the granting of a permit for these 98 units will
invariably lead to further development all along this coast. FAA would like to publicly appeal to the Prime Minister,
the Hon. Dr. Lawrence Gonzi, the new Minister responsible for the
Environment, to carry through the much-needed reform of MEPA regulations
with urgency, and especially to legislate the principle that applications
which violate ODZ regulations and are clearly inappropriate for our
countryside are immediately dismissed.
The processing of such applications is a huge waste of MEPA’s
time and the taxpayer’s money and also opens the door for other such
applications to slip through. The NGO reminds MEPA and the Government that the
protection of Malta’s landscape is enshrined in the Constitution,
therefore approval of such a project would violate not just MEPA
regulations but also Malta’s Constitution.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||