![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Touristic
Development should go hand in hand with Environmental and Heritage
Protection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
FAA
is pleased to note that the Parliamentary Secretary for Tourism has
dismissed outright the MTA Chairman's claim that MTA's only responsibility
is to push the country's tourism agenda without the need to concern itself
with environmental and heritage repercussions. While
recognizing the need to increase touristic investment, especially in areas
such as Marsascala which is badly in need of a general upgrade, the
environment group was dismayed by Malta Tourism Authority Chairman Sam
Mifsud's declaration last week that "the authority believed that the
north side of the island needed an area of entertainment to boost
tourism" and that the "authority's policy is to spread places of
entertainment to the north and to develop the coast". FAA agrees with Dr Demarco that too narrow a view was being taken when assessing tourism development applications, which ignored environmental considerations. Tourists are attracted by well-conserved heritage and are increasingly shunning environmental black spots. Relying on MEPA to pick up on any flaws in this regard was not an acceptable approach and hardly workable in the circumstances.
A
reviewed five-year tourism policy plan approved over 18 months ago
clearly requires that environmental considerations are
taken into account rather than the authority blindly pushing the country's
tourism agenda. It
is refreshing to hear that Dr Demarco acknowledges this. As he has
pointed out, nowhere in the tourism policy for 2007 – 2011 is it claimed
that places of entertainment should be allowed to spread to the greener
north of the island.
4th September 2008 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||