![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
THE
CITIZEN BETRAYED
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
“In its insistence on approving the Fort Cambridge
project before the completion of some of the most essential environment
studies, MEPA and Thus Government had two options; it could either gratify
investors immediately or wait a few weeks for the conclusion of the Sliema
Traffic Impact Study and implement any improvements that the study
recommended re. the Fort Cambridge project that will affect the health of
Sliema’s residents all the way up to Savoy. It was shocking to hear the new MEPA Chairman say that he
found no problem in issuing a decision on the permit before the conclusion
of the Traffic Impact Study, the most crucial part of the EIA.
This means that this unique chance to reduce toxic traffic
emissions related to this project, vehicle exhaust which increases the
incidence of asthma, cancer and heart disease in residents, is being
cavalierly thrown away. MEPA should also have requested a Social Impact Assessment (SIA) as repeatedly requested by the Sliema Local Council. In a totally residential area like Tigne, an SIA was essential to properly assess how increased traffic, dust, wind, vibrations, shading etc will affect residents. Other developers whose projects will not bring as much traffic into a residential area were obliged to carry out such a study, so why should GAP, the developers of this site, have been exempted? Furthermore residents, professionals, as well as a geological study of nearby Ghar id-dud, have all indicated the presence of caves in the site area. Early excavations have already caused problems of subsidence due to cracks in the rockbed, for which reason works to shore up the site had to be expedited. In view of this, FAA maintains that it is extremely irresponsible of MEPA to authorise a high-rise project without any geological study to identify underlying caves and rock faults on a site which may be compromised and which may pose future risks. Ultimately however,
the onus lies with Government. The
project brief issued on public land violates countless clauses of the
legally-ratified Local Plan which says : “There is pressure in localities such as St. Julian’s and Sliema to
increase building heights. However, many of the coastal belt residential
areas are over-developed and thus require a restrictive approach to
further development.” and again: “MEPA
will refuse development permission for any proposed development that is
likely to have a detrimental effect on strategic views and local views”
To have issued a project of these dimensions in view of the above shows
that Government callously valued the revenue from the sale of the site
over the health and well-being of its residents in a total abdication of
its duty to protect its citizens. The insistence to approve this project in haste, when
studies might have reduced the negative effects on residents, together
with the astounding approval of the Mistra Towers and the non-rescinding
of the Safi Supermarket permit all show that in spite of the countless promises on
sustainability, the recent election has changed nothing.
The discovery of the press release announcing the approval of the
permit before the hearing was held just confirms that public
consultation is a sham and that it is still developers that rule this
country due to a weak political class who are not prepared to stand up to
them. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||