![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fort
Cambridge and Mistra, communities at risk
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
In an
unprecedented move, MEPA is going to decide on not one, but two major
project that are going to seal the fate of a town, a seaside community and
a main thoroughfare, with irreversible impacts for all Malta. The
Fort Cambridge project proposes to add around 370 apartments to the Tigne
peninsula; if the Fort Cambridge, Townsquare and the extra MIDI blocks are
approved, it will mean the addition of over 1,800 new apartments in about
seven years within the square kilometre of Qui si-Sana/Tigne, set in an
area that has over 4,500 vacant homes. These apartments will bring
with them the additional traffic of about 4,000 cars, while the shops and
offices will attract hundreds of daytime commuters in violation of Policy
NHHO 03, as the North Harbour Flimkien
għal
Ambjent Aħjar (FAA) maintains that
the approval of this application will certainly not honour MEPA’s
commitment to protect and enhance Malta’s residential areas, as
increased daytime traffic will trap children and old people in their
homes, while movement and noise generated by night visitors to commercial,
catering and entertainment premises will disturb residents’ rest. Wind
funnelling and open balconies at heights over ten stories are a serious
worry for residents due to the risk of accidents. The proposed bank of
tall buildings will block air and sunlight reaching residences even
streets away. A recent Richmond Foundation Conference recently
raised the issue that over-urbanisation contributes to mental illness and
social isolation; are we to inflict this on our communities by approving
projects simply to enrich developers? Another
of the serious concern to FAA remains the threat to Malta’s precious
heritage. Specially designed as a new generation of low-lying forts,
Fort Cambridge will be completely obliterated by the massive proportions
of the blocks, which will be seen from all over the Island. This
violates the MEPA principle of key protected vistas, just as it violates
Valletta’s World Heritage skyline which will be punctuated by an
increasing number of tall buildings which fall within its buffer zone.
This will not only risk its world heritage status but also make the
Islands less attractive to tourists and film companies, therefore
impacting key sectors of our economy.
Again
the Mistra project would have a great negative impact on the landscape,
both from sea and from land, especially as it is to be built on a ridge
which is not allowed according to FAR regulations. The development
will also imperils our heritage as the EIA stated that the unique
Underground Flour Mill would be placed at risk by the building works which
will involve the road that forms the ceiling of the mill. Approval
of these projects which have not taken into account the full energy/water
efficiency 2007 regulations, will not only further deteriorate our climate
change prospects but also expose the taxpayer to major fines for not
conforming to EU Energy Directives. With emissions from particulate matter
at some 38 times higher than the highest international recommended levels,
Malta’s air pollution problems will also be aggravated. Yesterday
the MEPA Board published the outline of its highly positive proposals for
MEPA reform. Approval of these projects in clear violation of scores
of local and international regulations on the eve of MEPA reform will
certainly ring hollow. It is of course not for the Prime Minister to
interfere, but in taking on MEPA, he took on a leadership role.
As such all the nation looks to him to ensure that regulations are
not broken and that residents’ quality of life comes before
developers’ profits.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||