So far I have not deemed it necessary to express any opinion over the St. John’s extension project as the idea seemed so preposterous that I had no doubt at all that MEPA, in spite of all its deficiencies, would not even consider such a blasphemy. After reading Marco Cremona’s article on the Times on “Thorough and Independent EIAs”, I am horrified to realize that MEPA may actually be paving the way for granting a permit for development on a heritage and scheduled site. 

The negative impact on the actual site and the risks to the Cathedral and its environs have been amply discussed and are public knowledge. Does MEPA intend to beguile us with an EIA which is financially backed by the developers and expect us to believe that it is an honest and independent assessment? 

If this ludicrous project will indeed be approved by Mepa and the interests of the few will again prevail over the common good, I hope it will include a memorial plaque to remember those who have committed this Sacrilege for posterity. 

One question comes to mind as I write, namely; With so many unused buildings and palazzos in Valletta in need of restoration, why should the ‘Foundation’ think of  spending money on a new development which has no place in a Baroque City? What kinds of interests are involved and what is the Prime Minister’s say in all this? Did he not promise to take responsibility for Mepa? Why do obvious irregularities in cases like this still go unchecked?

C.Bezzina

The Malta Today - Sunday, 26th October 2008